A former high school football player, Scott Eveland of San Marcos, California, has settled his lawsuit with the school district over a head injury he sustained in a 2007 game. The injury has left him confined to a wheelchair, able to speak only through the use of an iPad or computer keyboard.
The issue of traumatic brain injuries in football has gained attention in recent months, with multiple lawsuits seeking damages from both athletic organizations and equipment manufacturers. Eveland had previously settled a products liability claim against the helmet manufacturers, and the remainder of the case focused on the liability of the school’s coaching staff.
Eveland was a senior at Mission Hills High School in San Marcos, located north of San Diego. He played linebacker for the varsity football team. According to the lawsuit, on September 14, 2007, he went to the athletic trainer to ask to sit out the first quarter because of a headache, which he claimed was so bad he could not focus his eyes. Eveland had already reportedly missed parts of practice due to headaches. The trainer went to the head coach who told the trainer, according to a student trainer who claimed to have witnessed the exchange, “You aren’t a [expletive] doctor,” and that the coach would decide who would play in the game. Both the trainer and the coach denied having this discussion in their depositions.
]]> Eveland started the game and played for about thirty minutes. He then collapsed on the field and was rushed to the hospital. He was reportedly on an operating table before the game was even over, undergoing emergency surgery to his skull. Doctors removed part of Eveland’s skull in order to save his life, but extensive bleeding in his brain caused severe and permanent damage. Eveland, who is now 22 years old, cannot stand on his own. He cannot speak, and therefore must use a keyboard or iPad in order to communicate. To use his communications device, he needs someone to prop up his arm by the elbow.Lawsuits against the school district and the helmet manufacturer sought damages for Eveland’s injuries and his future medical and support needs. Initially, the lawsuit focused on how long it took for an ambulance to arrive at the stadium. After the student trainer’s deposition testimony, offered in 2010, implicated the coaching staff, the lawsuit’s focus reportedly shifted to the question of the school district’s negligence. Specifically, it asked whether the coaching staff was negligent in failing to recognize Eveland’s condition before putting him in the game. Eveland’s attorney estimated the cost of Eveland’s future care at $25 million.
The court originally set the case for trial in January 2012. Eveland and his family settled their claim against the helmet manufacturer for $500,000 several months before the trial setting. The judge continued the trial until March, and the remaining parties agreed to a settlement. They announced a $4.375 million settlement on Friday, March 9, 2012, bringing Eveland’s total settlement close to $5 million.
The Washington, DC injury lawyers at Lebowitz & Mzhen fight to obtain just compensation for people injured due to the negligence or tortious actions of others. Contact us today online or at (800) 654-1949 to schedule a free and confidential consultation.
More Blog Posts:
The Death of a Young Baseball Player and the Lack of Statistics on Youth Sports Injuries, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, May 10, 2012
Washington DC Traumatic Brain Injuries May Up the Risk of Stroke and Dementia, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, August 10, 2011
Many Brain Injury Patients Suffer from Pseudobulbar Affect, Says Survey, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, January 6, 2012
Photo credit: 'American football in Tel-Aviv, Israel' by Ron Almog [CC-BY-2.0], via Wikimedia Commons.
]]>
A new product, described as “inhalable” or “breathable” caffeine, has drawn the attention of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to questions about its safety and suitability for the marketplace. This is due partly to recent incidents involving injuries and deaths allegedly caused by high-caffeine energy drinks, as well as the mixture of caffeine-containing energy drinks with alcohol. The apparent popularity of these products among college students and other young people is also a cause for concern.
The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), an office within the U.S. Department of Transportation, has delayed a final rule regarding rear visibility requirements in cars. This is the second delay of the rule since the agency began working on it. The purpose of the rule would be to prevent “backover” accidents due to a driver’s inability to see people or objects behind the vehicle. The Secretary of Transportation has said that they expect to have final standards ready by the end of 2012.
The Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (WMATA) settled seven lawsuits brought by the families of people killed in a 2009 crash on the Red Line. The crash remains the deadliest accident in WMATA’s history. The exact terms of the settlement are confidential. Along with three companies that provide equipment for the train system, WMATA has admitted liability for the crash in a court document filed in mid-February. Four remaining lawsuits, two for wrongful death and two for injuries sustained in the crash, are expected to go to trial.
A seven year-old student died at her Richmond, Virginia elementary school in January after she ate a peanut that a classmate gave to her. The girl, Amarria Denise Johnson, had a severe peanut allergy. She had an immediate allergic reaction and was taken to the school clinic. She then went into cardiac arrest and died.
A trucking accident on September 20, 1994 on the Capital Beltway in Prince George’s County, Maryland killed one person and left construction worker Brian Buber paralyzed. The subsequent fight over payment of damages shows how difficult it can be to enforce judgments against corporations and other business entities.
Four American civilians employed by security contractor Blackwater were killed in Fallujah, Iraq in March 2004 after gunmen opened fire on their vehicles. When the vehicles stopped, a crowd of people converged, throwing rocks and setting the vehicles on fire. The four men were shot and killed and, in a scene that would haunt American headlines, their bodies were pulled from the burned vehicles and dragged through the city. Pictures shown on television depicted people mutilating the bodies and hanging two of them from a bridge over the Euphrates River. Media around the world showed these images. The U.S. launched an assault on the city in response to the incident, which occurred at the beginning of the second year of American involvement in Iraq.
As medical devices grow increasingly sophisticated, disputes have begun to arise between doctors and medical device manufacturers over who bears the responsibility when a patient is injured by a device. In some instances, manufacturers try to hold doctors liable for using a device improperly, and in others doctors try to hold manufacturers liable if the device did not function correctly. Disputes such as these bring two different theories of liability together in unforeseen ways: medical malpractice and products liability. How these disputes are resolved could have an important impact on how courts assess liability in future malpractice cases.