Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog

Skechers Faces Lawsuits Alleging “Shape-Ups” Caused Severe Knee Injuries

May 15, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

An announcement was made recently, regarding the filing of several different lawsuits against Skechers on behalf of individuals from four different states, who have suffered meniscus injuries allegedly caused by the defective design of Shape-Ups toning shoes. The plaintiff consumers reside in Maryland, Mississippi, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

According to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs were injured when the rocking bottom of the shoe suddenly caused them to fall, resulting in a torn meniscus. A torn meniscus is a painful knee injury, which involves damage to the cartilage in between the thigh bone and the shin bone (the meniscus). While physical therapy can sometimes help, surgery is often needed in order to adequately fix the injury.

This is not the first time Skechers has faced scrutiny for its Shape-Ups. The shoes were marketed toward consumers for having various health benefits, including allegedly increasing muscle tone simply by wearing them. According to documents filed by the plaintiffs, an independent study on the shoes found no evidence of increased intensity of exercise, increased burning of calories, or increased muscle strength or tone from wearing them.

Therefore, in 2012 Skechers was ordered by the Federal Trade Commission to pay $40 million for its misleading advertising campaigns. This order included a court determination that Skechers failed to warn consumers about potential risks associated with these shoes, and that the company had not performed adequate safety testing.

Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Laws Lead to Lower Death Rates for Children

May 7, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

Earlier this week, the American Academy of Pediatrics made a press release about the results of a study regarding the effectiveness of laws that require bicyclists to wear helmets.The data revealed that fewer deaths occurred among youths who were involved in bicycle-motor vehicle crash within those states that had mandatory helmet laws in place.

Researchers set out to determine the efficacy of mandatory bicycle helmet laws in reducing injuries and death rates nationwide by analyzing data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System for all U.S. bicyclists. They looked at data for all accidents involving children under the age of sixteen who were either severely injured or died during the period of January 1999 until December 2009. They compared data for states with mandatory laws versus those without.

During the relevant period, a total of 2,451 children suffered incapacitating injuries or died in bicycle-motor vehicle crashes. States with mandatory helmet laws had a lower rate of incapacitating injuries or death at approximately 2 per 1 million, versus 2.5 per 1 million. The associated lower rates held true even after adjusting for certain relevant factors.

Maryland is one of the 21 states that requires bicyclists to wear helmets, which could have a direct impact on residents who bicycle in the DC area.

Federal Court Hears Oral Argument on NFL Concussion Litigation Motion to Dismiss

April 30, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

Oral arguments were heard in a federal district court in Pennsylvania earlier this month over the motion to dismiss filed by the National Football League regarding concussion injury litigation.

Plaintiffs contend that for many decades, the National Football League has withheld information on purpose and misstated the potential harm and safety risks that result from concussions and miscellaneous other injuries sustained by football players in the course of play. The legal filings include fraud and negligence claims.

The plaintiffs’ attorney summarized the NFL’s responsibilities to the players by stating at oral argument that the NFL was holding itself out to be the “guarantor of safety”.

Counsel for the defense claimed that the players’ collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) preempts the athletes’ legal claims, and that the parties should engage in arbitration in lieu of the tort litigation process. He further noted the defendant’s position that the NFL, the players, and the teams each have involvement and share responsibility in regards to players’ well being and safety.

There are now over 4,000 individual plaintiffs participating in this and related litigation, and this figure is continuing to increase. These plaintiffs make up over 200 separate lawsuits that the court has consolidated and transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The National Football League Players’ Concussion Injury Litigation, has resulted in increased scrutiny from legal and sports circles. The plaintiffs in these cases include several former NFL players and/or their family members, who have suffered a variety of degenerative brain diseases or other related conditions due to incurring repeated concussions during the course of their NFL careers.

Following this hearing, the judge will decide if the case should survive the defendant’s assertions that the CBA preempts the injury claims, or whether it should be dismissed.

Despite Fewer Recalls, Defective Children’s Products Cause Increased Number of Injuries and Deaths in 2012

April 23, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

According to a recent report by product safety advocacy organization Kids In Danger (KID), the frequency with which children’s products were recalled in 2012 does not correlate with the increased number of injuries and deaths cause by products in the same year.

While only 97 children’s products were recalled in 2012, which is coincidentally the lowest number since 2004, when compared with 2011, the occurrence of incidents related to defective children’s products was as follows:

Overall incidents were up 49%
Injuries were up 42%
Deaths increased 200%
The number of children’s products recalled dropped by 20%

In fact, according to the KID report, most parents reported hearing of product recalls around once or twice a month, even though in 2012 a children’s product was recalled every three and a half days on average.

In addition to the new data above, the study put forth two main conclusions regarding the safety of children’s products. First, many of the well established standards, such as those relating to flammability, drawstrings, or small parts to name a few, continue to be commonly violated. For example, children’s clothing must have the drawstrings anchored in place to avoid posing a strangulation risk, and several recalled products during 2012 were recalled for failing to meet that rule. According to the study, 22 products were recalled for failing to meet these and other standards.

Secondly, many products that are intended to be used by infants and small children are not subject to any formal safety standards. These include things like travel beds and crib tents. These kinds of products were associated with several deaths in 2012.

It is important for the consumer to note that products are not usually recalled following a single incident. Unfortunately, it may take many injuries and in some cases deaths before the manufacturer will decide to voluntarily recall the product, or until the Consumer Product Safety Commission requires it to do so. Therefore, it is important to seek out reviews of children’s products, and be sure to check governmental and company websites for updated information regarding potential recalls.

Parents Call for Passage of Federal Rear View Camera Law

April 16, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

This week a group of parents spent time in Washington, D.C., urging lawmakers to act on a law, initially introduced some five years ago, which is aimed at preventing tragic accidents by requiring rear view cameras on cars.

It has been estimated that over 1,500 kids have been killed as a result of limited visibility in blind spots. Many parents who’ve tragically lost their children in these types of accidents believe that rear view cameras may have prevented these tragedies. At least one graphic claims that up to 62 children can be hidden within a Chevy Suburban’s blind spot.

One mother recounted the tragic death of her one and a half year old son two years ago, whom she accidentally hit when she didn’t see him as she backed her car out. The car the mother was driving did have motion sensors, but did not detect her son. A week after the accident, the woman and the rest of her family got cars which were equipped with rear view cameras. She has been advocating for them to be installed in cars ever since.

The legislation that would require rear view cameras has allegedly been tabled four times, with lawmakers citing concerns over technology and additional costs. The ‘Kids and Cars‘ advocacy group claims that adding a rearview camera to a car only adds an additional $175 to a car’s sale price, and that for parents it is a small price to pay.

U.S. Supreme Court to Rule on Liability of Generic Drug Manufacturers

April 9, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to make a ruling on a very important pharmaceutical case this term. At issue is whether a generic drug manufacturer can face a lawsuit for their inability to warn consumers of potentially dangerous side effects.

The case at issue involves the drug manufacturer Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., which has appealed a jury award of $21 million in a case where the plaintiff took a generic NSAID drug made by the company for shoulder pain as prescribed by her doctor, and instead suffered incredibly serious complications. The verdict was affirmed at both the trial and appeal levels.

In this case, three weeks after the woman took the drug at issue, she developed a rare and severe reaction, which caused her skin to peel off, leaving her with burn-like lesions over two-thirds of her body. She spent some of the nearly two months during which she was in a hospital burn unit in a medically induced coma, and has had to undergo 13 eye surgeries.

The reaction, which is considered to have been a severe form of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, caused the woman to suffer permanent near-blindness, scarred lungs and a constricted esophagus, making it difficult to swallow. She originally sued the manufacturer under state law in 2008 for alleged design defects. Following a 14 day trial, the jury awarded her $21 million for her injuries and suffering.

The appeal centers on the applicability of two prior court rulings, particularly PLIVA v. Mensing, which held that generic drugmakers cannot be sued for failing to warn about certain health risks due to the fact that federal law requires generic drugs to carry the same warning label as their brand name equivalents. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the court will choose to distinguish this case in that it does not solely claim a failure to warn, but also argues a design defect, which again may potentially be excludable under prior case law.

Ford Announces Nationwide Recall of Certain Freestar and Mercury Monterey Models

March 28, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

Earlier this month, Ford announced the recall of several of its Freestar and Mercury Monterey Vehicles. Owners of either of these types of vehicles should check any records they have relevant to their vehicles, and contact the dealer if necessary in order to determine if your vehicle is affected by this recall.

Vehicles subject to this recall meet all of the following criteria:

have a manufacture date falling within the period of March 24, 2003 through November 7, 2006
are equipped with a third row seat
originally sold in, or are now registered in the following states: CO, DE, IL, IN, IA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MO, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, VT, WV, WI, and Washington D.C.

The recall has been initiated due to a potential defect in the stowable seat in the third row. The anchor mechanism that is mounted to the rear wheel wells can suffer from corrosion, leading to structural degradation. Thus, as a result of the corrosion, the third row seat may not latch properly into its seating position. This is potentially dangerous, because a rear end collision could cause great personal injury to a person sitting in an unlatched seat.

Ford has said that it will notify owners and that dealers will install replacement third row seat latch striker mounting brackets, which will hopefully rectify the problem.

Judge Finds National Park Service Negligent in Boy’s Fall Death

March 27, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

A Sacramento federal magistrate judge handed down his decision last week regarding a summer vacation turned tragedy. A 9-year-old boy was visiting the Lassen Volcanic National Park with his family in July of 2009, when the boy and his sister sat on a retaining wall in order to take some pictures. The wall quickly gave way, throwing both of the children down the mountainside, killing the boy and injuring his sister. The family filed a wrongful death and personal injury lawsuit against the park for its negligence in failing to maintain the wall.

In his ruling, the judge held that negligence on behalf of National Park Service officials caused the boy’s death when the wall gave way. He also reprimanded the park’s superintendent for making several fraudulent statements regarding evidence and interview attempts, and the alleged destruction of critical evidence relevant to the case.

The findings relate to destruction of documents during the discovery (evidence collection) portion of the case, including the shredding of an internal memorandum regarding the potential instability of the wall and other relevant documents. There were also damning statements from a governmental architect, and further evidence that the park superintendent lied about attempts to be interviewed by the park agency’s inspector. The wall was also torn down within weeks following the incident, further disallowing the inspector the opportunity to inspect the wall.

Dialysis Drug Subject of Wrongful Death Suits Countrywide

March 20, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

A Texas woman has filed a wrongful death suit against the manufacturers of the drug GranuFlo, alleging that the manufacturer is responsible for the death of her husband.

The drug at the center of the lawsuit, called GranuFlo, is used for treatment in dialysis patients who are suffering from kidney failure. The integral chemical component of the drug acts by removing blood impurities which the kidneys can no longer remove on their own.

Her lawsuit claims that Fresenius USA is responsible for the death of her husband, who died two days after he received treatment with the drug. The suit alleges that the plaintiff’s husband began to feel ill immediately following a dialysis treatment which involved the administration of GranuFlo. Two days after the treatment, the plaintiff called an ambulance for her husband who was complaining of pain in his chest and head. However, her husband had died of a heart attack before any help arrived. Her suit alleges that in addition to being responsible for her husband’s death, the manufacturer may have known of the risks of the product as early as 2003, yet no action was taken. The woman seeks damages for her husband’s pain and suffering as well as for the loss of her spouse.

March 29, 2012 was the date the FDA instituted the initial class 1 recall for Naturalyte and Granuflo Acid Concentrate. A Class 1 recall is the highest priority recall issued by the FDA, and is only issued in cases where there is a significant chance that a drug can cause serious injury or death. These products have been linked to elevated levels of bicarbonate in treated blood, which can potentially cause stroke, heart attack and death. Almost immediately, lawsuits began to be filed nationwide.

D.C. Considering Requirement for Gun Owners to Purchase Liability Insurance

March 6, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

D.C. Lawmakers introduced legislation earlier this week which would require gun owners to maintain insurance policies of at least$250,000. The policies would be in place for gunshot victims, in order to help pay for any potential medical costs, and also to promote gun safety.

The bill is intended to cover, “any damages resulting from negligent acts, or willful acts that are not undertaken in self-defense.” So far, at least six states have introduced similar gun liability insurance laws, but as of mid-February, none of the states have actually passed such measures.

Gun owner liability policies are already offered through organizations such as the National Rifle Association. The only difference that would occur as a result of this bill, and those similar to it, is that in addition to creating a potential fund, the decision to carry coverage would no longer be voluntary. It is estimated that medical care for those killed or injured by gunfire in 2010 cost an estimated $3.2 billion.

Gun owners are already criminally and civilly liable for their conduct, as well as potentially liable for any damage or injuries caused by their guns. The act of requiring an insurance policy merely ensures that there is an accessible fund available for victims and their families to make claims against.